Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
UK Bookies Lose £1.2 Billion in a Day as Investors Duck Regulatory Wrecking Ball editorial policy.
  1. Coney Island Public Engagement Report Reveals Community Opposition to $3B Casino

Compare Accounts
×
Bellagio Security Rescued Puppy Finds New Home After Frightening Ordeal
Provider
Name
Description
Union Leaders Demand More Health Safeguards Before Casinos Reopen  Caesars Entertainment Continues Global Expansion in Mexico  Greece’s Planned Integrated Resort To Include Country’s First Skyscraper  NFL Draft Round One Betting Recap, Cleveland Browns Roll Dice With Baker Mayfield  Hollywood Casino York Goes 24/7, to Add Slots at Pennsylvania Satellite  Osaka Casino Up and Running by 2023 Despite Hurdles, Says Governor  Gambling Embezzler Siphons $470k From British Cryptocurrency App Developer  Missouri Senate Includes Truck Stop Pull Tabs in Latest Budget, Controversy Ensues  Closed Maryland Casinos Costs State $60M in April, Education Loses $45M  Billy Walters Released, ‘Extremely Grateful’ After Feds Amend Insider Trading Sentence